ABSTRACT
Introducción: la fibromialgia (FM) es un síndrome caracterizado por la presencia de dolor musculoesquelético crónico y generalizado, de origen no articular, que puede llegar a ser invalidante y afectar la esfera biológica, psicológica y social del paciente. Estado del arte: no se han publicado recomendaciones nutricionales específicas para las personas con FM y también existe un vago conocimiento acerca de los parámetros relacionados con la evaluación de la composición corporal (masa musculoesquelética, masa grasa, agua corporal, etc.) y la alteración en la fuerza muscular (p. ej., dinapenia, por dinamometría de mano, flexión de la rodilla, entre otras), así como la evaluación en términos de sarcopenia. Discusión: pocos estudios publicados hasta el momento describen en profundidad la composición corporal de las personas con FM. La mayoría se centran casi exclusivamente en la descripción del peso y el índice de masa corporal (IMC), por lo que existe poco conocimiento acerca de otros parámetros de relevancia, como por ejemplo aquellos relacionados con masa y fuerza muscular o masa grasa. La alimentación se menciona en varias publicaciones, pero no existen guías o pautas específicas de recomendaciones nutricionales para esta población. Algunos pacientes adoptan diversas dietas, estrategias o planes alimentarios sin ningún tipo de orientación de los profesionales de la salud, e incluso a veces, siguiendo fuentes de información no fiables, poniendo en riesgo su salud. Las publicaciones científicas no evalúan la asociación o el impacto del estado nutricional y la inadecuada alimentación en la calidad de vida. Conclusiones: en las personas con FM, conocer el estado nutricional, más allá del peso, determinando la composición corporal y la prevalencia de dinapenia o sarcopenia o ambas permitiría realizar un abordaje nutricional más adecuado. Este conocimiento podría ser coadyuvante en la terapéutica, logrando una mejoría en su desempeño físico y una mejor calidad de vida. (AU)
Introduction: fibromyalgia (FM) is a syndrome charcaterized by the presence of chronic, and generalized musculoskeletal pain, not articular in origin, which can become disabling and affect the biological, psychological, and social sphere of the patient. State of the art: no specific nutritional recommendations have been published for people with FM and there is also a vague knowledge regarding parameters related to body composition assessment (skeletal muscle mass, body fat mass, water, etc.) and loss of muscle strength (for example, dynapenia, by handgrip, knee flexion, among others), as well as assessment in terms of sarcopenia. Discussion: there are few studies published so far that completely describe the body composition in people with FM. Most of them focus almost exclusively on weight and body mass index (BMI), so there is a lack of knowledge about other descriptive parameters, such as those related to muscle mass and strength or fat mass. Diet is mentioned in several publications, but there are no specific guidelines for nutritional recommendations for this population. Some patients follow several diets, strategies or eating plans without health care professionals' guidance, and sometimes even following unreliable sources of information, putting themselves at risk. Scientific publications do not evaluate the association or impact of nutritional status and inadequate nutrition on quality of life in FM. Conclusions: in people with FM, knowledge of the nutritional status, beyond weight, determining body composition and the prevalence of dynapenia and/or sarcopenia would allow a more accurate nutritional approach. This knowledge could be helpful for the treatment, achieving an improvement in their physical performance and a better quality of life. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Fibromyalgia/diet therapy , Nutrition Assessment , Sarcopenia/diet therapy , Quality of Life , Body Composition , Exercise , Body Mass Index , Muscle Strength , Physical Functional PerformanceABSTRACT
La sarcopenia se define como una combinación de baja fuerza y masa muscular con alteración funcional del músculo, que afecta a poblaciones de diferentes edades por diversos motivos. La prevalencia global en adultos mayores se ha estimado en 10% (IC 95%: 8-12%) en hombres y 10% (IC 95%: 8-13%) en mujeres. Recientemente ha cobrado importancia su detección en enfermedades reumáticas, particularmente las inflamatorias. En esta revisión narrativa hemos considerado: a) recomendaciones para el diagnóstico de la sarcopenia; b) herramientas útiles para la práctica clínica y la investigación; c) su relación con las enfermedades reumáticas. Según el último Consenso Europeo de Sarcopenia la búsqueda debe comenzar cuando el paciente reporta síntomas y/o signos (debilidad, lentitud al caminar, desgaste muscular, pérdida de masa muscular, etc.). Para los adultos mayores se recomienda el cuestionario SARC-F como herramienta de tamizaje. Varias pruebas establecen los puntos de corte que deben utilizarse para diagnosticar la baja fuerza muscular, la disminución en la masa muscular y la alteración en el rendimiento físico. La relevancia de diagnosticar precozmente la sarcopenia se basa en el impacto clínico, económico y social que tiene, incluyendo la funcionalidad y calidad de vida de las personas, muy importante en aquellas con enfermedades reumatológicas.
Sarcopenia is defined as a combination of low muscle strength and mass with muscle function impairment that affects the population at different age ranges for different reasons. The global prevalence at the elderly was estimated at 10% (95% CI: 8-12%) in men and 10% (95% CI: 8-13%) in women. In recent years, the detection of sarcopenia in rheumatic diseases has become relevant. The aim of this revision was to develop a review regarding: a) recommendations for the diagnosis of sarcopenia; b) most useful tools for detection in clinical practice and research; c) relationship with some rheumatic diseases. According to the latest European Sarcopenia Consensus, in clinical practice, the search must start when the patient reports symptoms and signs (weakness, slow walking, muscle wasting, disease that leads to muscle loss, etc.). For the elderly population the SARC-F test is recommended as a screening tool. Several tests have established cut-off points to be used to diagnose low muscle strength, decrease in muscle mass or physical performance impairment. The relevance of early diagnosis of sarcopenia is based on the clinical, economic, social impact and also on functionality and quality of life in people, particularly in those with rheumatic diseases.
Subject(s)
AgedABSTRACT
RESUMO: Objetivo: Estimar a prevalência e os fatores associados à sarcopenia, dinapenia e sarcodinapenia em idosos residentes no município de São Paulo. Métodos: Estudo transversal de base populacional envolvendo 1.168 idosos pertencentes à terceira onda do Estudo SABE (Saúde, Bem-Estar e Envelhecimento), em 2010. Foramconsiderados sarcopênicos os idosos com índice de massa muscular esquelética ≤ 8,90 kg/m2 para homens e ≤6,37 kg/m2 para mulheres, dinapênicos aqueles com força de preensão manual < 30 kg para homens e < 20kg para mulheres, e sarcodinapênicos aqueles que apresentavam sarcopenia associada à dinapenia. Características sociodemográficas, comportamentais, condições clínicas, nutricionais e bioquímicas foram consideradas para determinar os fatores associados a cada uma das três condições por meio de regressão logística multinomial. Resultados: A prevalência de sarcopenia, dinapenia e sarcodinapenia foi, respectivamente, 4,8% (IC95% 3,6-6,3), 30,9% (IC95% 27,5-34,6) e 9,0% (IC95% 7,2-11,3). O avanço da idade e a desnutrição foram associados às três condições analisadas. O prejuízo cognitivo foi associado à dinapenia e à sarcodinapenia. A escolaridade, ter o hábito de fumar e não ter vida conjugal foram associados à sarcopenia, enquanto osteoartrite, escolaridade, ser ex-fumante e apresentar valores baixos de hemoglobina foram associados à dinapenia. Foram associados à sarcodinapenia o hábito de fumar e o risco de desnutrição. Conclusão: Dinapenia é a condição mais prevalente na população idosa, seguida pela sarcodinapenia e sarcopenia. Exceto por idade, escolaridade e desnutrição, os fatores associados à sarcopenia e à dinapenia são distintos. Entretanto, há similaridades em algumas associações quando se trata da presença de sarcodinapenia.
ABSTRACT: Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of sarcopenia, dynapenia, and sarcodynapenia and associated factors in older adults in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods: A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,168 older adults who participated in the third wave of the Health, Well-being, and Aging study in 2010 (SABE study). Men and women with skeletal muscle mass ≤ 8.90 and ≤ 6.37 kg/m2, respectively, were considered sarcopenic. Men and women with grip strength < 30 and < 20 kg, respectively, were considered dynapenic. Those with both conditions were considered sarcodynapenic. Sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, nutritional, and biochemical characteristics were investigated as factors associated with each of the three conditions using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Theprevalence of sarcopenia, dynapenia, and sarcodynapenia was 4.8% (95%CI 3.6 - 6.3), 30.9% (95%CI 27.5 - 34.6) and 9.0% (95%CI 7.2-11.3), respectively. An increase in age and malnutrition was associated with all the three conditions. Cognitive impairment was associated with both dynapenia and sarcodynapenia. Schooling, current smoking habit, and not having a marital life were associated with sarcopenia. Osteoarthritis, schooling, being an ex-smoker, and low hemoglobin were associated with dynapenia. Smoking habit and the risk of malnutrition were associated with sarcodynapenia. Conclusion: Dynapenia is more prevalent among older adults, followed by sarcodynapenia, and sarcopenia. With the exception of age, schooling, and malnutrition, the factors associated with sarcopenia and dynapenia are different. However, there are similarities in some associations regarding the presence of sarcodynapenia.